CCP Releases New Research on Clean Elections and Scandals

September 23, 2011   •  By IFS staff
Default Article

Sarah Lee, Communications Director,

Center for Competitive Politics

703.894.6824

slee@campaignfreedom.org

ALEXANDRIA, Va. — The Center for Competitive Politics has recently released a new research report titled, “Clean Elections and Scandal: Case Studies from Maine, Arizona and New York City.”The report, which details the potential for scandal inherent the matching funds programs included in many states “Clean Elections” legislation, was compiled and produced by Jason Farrell of CCP’s Research Department.

The report uses data collected from a number of news reports and official sources that detailed problems with Clean Election systems in the state campaign finance systems in Maine, Arizona, and New York City. In light of the June 27, 2011 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Arizona Free Enterprise Club v. Bennett that stated the use of “matching funds,” whereby a privately-financed candidate for political office would be forced to trigger state-granted matching funds for any publicly-funded opponent if he or she spent above a certain threshold, were an unconstitutional demand on a candidate whose speech would be chilled by the mandate, the goal was to show how these programs not only fail to deter corruption, they can often exacerbate it, and public funds granted to candidates are often wasted in ways that are both difficult to prove and difficult to track.

Farrell, who spent several months producing the report, notes that the need to produce coherent documentation on the systemic problems with these programs arose from the already existing scandals in the states, and to address the misnomer of these programs as “clean.”

“The abuse of public funds is so severe and the record of corrupt practices and other misdeeds are so rampant, particularly in the city of New York, that such a system cannot possibly live up to the ‘clean’ moniker that has been assigned to it by proponents,” he said.

In addition to countering the complaints against the Court over the Bennett decision, the hope is that state or local governments who may be seeking to employ New York City’s still-legal “super match” funds might be deterred after considering evidence of waste, fraud and abuse within the city’s Clean Election system.

CCP Government Relations expert Matt Nese and former CCP President Sean Parnell also contributed to this report.

 

IFS staff

Share via
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap