Free Speech Arguments – Can the Government Shut Down TikTok or Force its Sale? (TikTok Inc. v. Merrick Garland)

The Free Speech Arguments Podcast brings you oral arguments from important First Amendment free political speech cases across the country. Find us on Spotify and Apple Podcasts.

January 10, 2025   •  By IFS Staff   •    •  

Episode 22: TikTok Inc. V. Merrick Garland

TikTok Inc. v. Merrick Garland, argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on January 10, 2025. Argued by Noel Francisco (on behalf of TikTok, Inc. and ByteDance, Ltd.) and Jeffrey Fisher (on behalf of Creator Petitioners Brian Firebaugh, et al.), and Elizabeth Prelogar, Solicitor General of the United States (on behalf of Merrick Garland).

Background on the case: Adam Feldman’s “The Universe of TikTok v. Garland in a Nutshell” contains an excellent synopsis of relevant facts and procedural history.

Question Presented:

Whether the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, as applied to petitioners, violates the First Amendment.

Resources:

Listen to the argument here:

     

The Institute for Free Speech promotes and defends the political speech rights to freely speak, assemble, publish, and petition the government guaranteed by the First Amendment. If you’re enjoying the Free Speech Arguments podcast, please subscribe and leave a review on your preferred podcast platform.

IFS Staff

Share via
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap