NOTE: This blog post will provide updates on the states that have enacted new or improved existing anti-SLAPP laws since the November 2023 publication of our Anti-SLAPP Report Card.

May 24, 2024: Minnesota Enacts Robust Anti-SLAPP Law

In a win for free speech and improved public discourse, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz has signed into law a robust new anti-SLAPP statute (HF 5216). SLAPP stands for “Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation.” SLAPPs are a form of frivolous lawsuit often filed by wealthy individuals or entities with the goal of intimidating critics and draining their resources through lengthy, expensive legal battles. 

The new Minnesota law adopts the Uniform Law Commission’s model Uniform Public Expression Protection Act. It contains the key features outlined by free speech advocates across the political spectrum to create a strong deterrent against SLAPP suits: 

• It protects all speech on matters of public concern, not just specific categories like statements to the government. 
• Defendants can file a special motion to quickly dismiss meritless claims and halt burdensome “discovery” processes until the court rules. 
• Plaintiffs must substantiate their claims and show a legitimate case early on to overcome an anti-SLAPP motion. 
• Defendants can immediately appeal if their anti-SLAPP motion is denied, avoiding a punishing trial. 
• If defendants prevail, they are awarded costs and attorneys’ fees—a crucial fee-shifting provision to deter SLAPPs. 

With these robust provisions, Minnesota residents can speak out on public issues without fearing retaliatory legal actions designed to bankrupt and bully them into silence. The anti-SLAPP law creates a more equitable playing field for speakers of all means against the deep pockets of corporations or suit-happy individuals who might try to suppress criticism.

Free speech is a bedrock American principle that Minnesota has rightly acted to safeguard. This new law is a vital shield against meritless litigation that undermines our democracy and public discourse. Minnesotans can now debate issues freely, more secure in the knowledge that the law provides the important tools to fight off any SLAPPs. 

Minnesotans once enjoyed a modicum of protection against SLAPP suits until the state supreme court ruled that law unconstitutional in 2017. In the intervening years, the Institute for Free Speech awarded Minnesota an “F” grade for not having any protection for speakers who want to speak out publicly on matters of concern. As of this week, Minnesota has become the 34th state to inoculate their citizens against this malicious form of lawfare. The new law is free of the defects present in the old law and is likely to withstand any challenges to it in court.

The new anti-SLAPP law originated as HF3309 and SF3317, but later became part of a larger bill that addressed “public safety and judiciary budget and policy provisions.” That omnibus bill was signed by the governor on May 24, 2024 and the new anti-SLAPP law took effect the following day. It applies to “applies to a civil action pending on or commenced on or after” the effective date. 

We applaud Minnesota House Representatives Cedrick Frazier and Harry Niska, and Senators Bonnie Westlin and Michael Kreun, as well as Governor Walz, for their hard work shepherding this important reform across the finish line.

April 13, 2024: Maine Enacts Robust Anti-SLAPP Law

Maine’s current anti-SLAPP law covers a limited amount of speech and falls short on several vital procedural protections. A new and improved bill (SP 367) became law on April 13 and will take effect on January 1, 2025. 

Maine is one of many states where a bill passed by the legislature can become law without the governor’s signature. In Maine, if the governor does not veto a piece of legislation within ten days of receiving it, the legislation becomes law, which happened here. 

Maine’s existing anti-SLAPP law earned a C- in our 2023 anti-SLAPP report card because of three flaws in the 1995 statute. First, the law covered speech only in public proceedings, which meant that many types of speech and speech in other forums, such as online, were not protected. Second, there was no provision for an immediate appeal (interlocutory appeal) if an anti-SLAPP motion was denied, saddling defendants with burdensome discovery and often a trial in a frivolous case. Finally, the statute only gave courts the option, not the requirement, to award attorney fees and court costs to prevailing defendants, which could discourage legal representation for defendants with limited resources. 

The new law, modeled on the Uniform Law Commission’s model Uniform Public Expression Protection Act (UPEPA), corrects these failings by expanding the covered speech to include oral, print, and online forums. It provides an opportunity for interlocutory appeal and requires an award of attorney’s fees and reasonable costs when an anti-SLAPP motion is approved. Therefore, we expect Maine’s new law to earn a top grade for the state.  

As is often the case, the measure passed both chambers without opposition.  

As a result of the hard work of the bill’s sponsors, led by Senator Michael Tipping, and many civil liberties allies, residents of the Pine Tree State will enjoy new protections against frivolous lawsuits related to free speech.