Default Article

Political Spending: Civic Engagement is Not a Threat to Democracy

January 1, 2018  •  By IFS Staff  •    •  

The First Amendment guarantees every American freedom of speech. That freedom includes the right to spend money on speech. Without money, a political group cannot buy ads, print fliers, organize protests, or hire staff. Short of shouting one’s opinions on a street corner, it takes money to spread a message. Recognizing this relationship, the Supreme Court has long prohibited the…

Challenging the presumptions of America’s Fiscal Crisis: Follow the Money

Default Article
September 28, 2011   •  By Jason Farrell   •  ,

Americans for Campaign Reform, a reform advocacy group chaired by former US Senators Bill Bradley, Bob Kerrey, Warren Rudman and Alan Simpson (of the ...

The Myth of the Level Playing Field: Knowledge, Affect, and Repitition in Public Debate

March 1, 2010   •  By IFS staff   •  ,

Justice Holmes famously asserted that “the best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the ...

Campaign Fund-raising and Spending for Deterrence and Savings

April 1, 2009   •  By IFS staff   •  , ,

I present a model of fund-raising in repeated elections where funds are raised to deter the entry of strong challengers, and to increase the probability ...

Does Money Buy Elections? The Impact of Spending on U.S. Congressional Campaigns

January 1, 2008   •  By IFS staff   •  , ,

For many Americans, money is one of the most troubling aspects in modern election campaigns. The reasons voters give are simple: money is seen as a barrier ...

Campaign Finance Red Tape: Strangling Free Speech & Political Debate

October 1, 2007   •  By IFS staff   •  , , ,

Twenty-four states permit citizens to make laws directly through ballot measures. These states also regulate how citizens—if they band together—may speak out about them. In the name ...

Does Money Buy Power? Interest Group Resources and Policy Outcomes

Default Article
April 12, 2007   •  By IFS Staff   •  , ,

Abstract: Popular accounts of interest group influence in the policy process often focus on organizational budgets and campaign contributions, asserting that these resources lead ...

Campaign War Chests and Challenger Quality in Senate Elections

February 1, 2007   •  By IFS staff   •  , ,

This article presents the first comprehensive analysis of the role of war chests in U.S. Senate elections. Using data on races from 1980 to 2000, ...

Does Money Guarantee Election?

Default Article
October 23, 2006   •  By Brad Smith   •  ,

Barron's is predicting minimal Republican losses this year, based almost entirely on candidate fund raising totals.  How valid is this analysis?  Click the header ...

Lamont, Lieberman, and the Distorting Effects of Campaign Finance Law on Political Competition

Default Article
August 9, 2006   •  By Brad Smith   •  , ,

Ned Lamont's primary victory over Joe Lieberman exposes the ways in which our campaign finance laws distort the political choices available to Americans and ...

The Per Curiam Opinion of Steel: Buckley v. Valeo as Superprecedent? Clues from Wisconsin and Vermont

August 1, 2006   •  By Matt Nese   •  , ,

he rich tapestry of American campaign finance law continued to accumulate threads with the Court’s decisions this term in Randall v. Sorrell4 and Wisconsin Right to ...

Load more