Default Article

Political Spending: Civic Engagement is Not a Threat to Democracy

January 1, 2018  •  By IFS Staff  •    •  

The First Amendment guarantees every American freedom of speech. That freedom includes the right to spend money on speech. Without money, a political group cannot buy ads, print fliers, organize protests, or hire staff. Short of shouting one’s opinions on a street corner, it takes money to spread a message. Recognizing this relationship, the Supreme Court has long prohibited the…

Diverse Coalition Lines Up to Support Free Political Speech

Default Article
May 10, 2006   •  By IFS staff   •  , ,

The Institute for Justice joins hands with CCP and other supporters such as the Cato Institute to fight Vermont’s Act 64, which imposes expenditure limits on ...

Free Speech and the 527 Prohibition

April 3, 2006   •  By Steve Hoersting   •  ,

Proponents of measures to make independent section 527 organizations into “political committees” under the Federal Election Campaign Act, subjecting the organizations to federal campaign limits and ...

State Campaign Finance Reform, Competitiveness, and Party Advantage in Gubernatorial Elections

April 1, 2006   •  By IFS staff   •  , , ,

Electoral competition is thought to be the cornerstone of democratic rule, yet many policymakers, scholars, and concerned citizens perceive the existence of a competitiveness crisis in ...

Fooling the Court

Bradley A. Smith, Chairman and Founder
March 1, 2006   •  By Brad Smith   •  ,

The two cases we’ve been discussing this week share, in my mind, a defining characteristic: each involves attempts to fool the Court about what ...

Much More of the Same: Television Advertising Pre- and Post-BCRA

January 1, 2006   •  By IFS staff   •  , ,

Before the passage of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA), television advertising was the main way candidates for office communicated with voters. Before the passage of ...

Unrepresentative Information: The Case of Newspaper Reporting on Campaign Finance

June 6, 2005   •  By IFS staff   •  , ,

This paper examines evidence of sampling or statistical bias in newspaper reporting on campaign finance. We compile all stories from the five largest circulation newspapers ...

When Do War Chests Deter?

January 1, 2005   •  By IFS staff   •  , ,

Do war chests deter challengers? And if so, under what circumstances do they deter? An anecdote reveals one circumstance when war chests may deter.

War Chests as Precautionary Savings

December 1, 2004   •  By IFS staff   •  ,

Conventional wisdom states that incumbents possess resources that prevent quality candidates from challenging them. This is a potential problem because quality challengers are more likely to ...

Did Firms Profit from Soft Money?

March 15, 2004   •  By IFS staff   •  , ,

This paper uses event study methodology to measure whether firms that gave soft money to political parties received excessively high rates of returns from their ...

Pay to Play: Parties, Interests, and Money in Federal Elections

January 1, 2004   •  By IFS staff   •  ,

This chapter first appeared in The Medium and the Message:  Television Advertising and American Elections, edited by Kenneth Goldstein and Patricia Strach (Englewood Cliffs, ...

Load more