Default Article

Political Spending: Civic Engagement is Not a Threat to Democracy

January 1, 2018  •  By IFS Staff  •    •  

The First Amendment guarantees every American freedom of speech. That freedom includes the right to spend money on speech. Without money, a political group cannot buy ads, print fliers, organize protests, or hire staff. Short of shouting one’s opinions on a street corner, it takes money to spread a message. Recognizing this relationship, the Supreme Court has long prohibited the…

The Benefits of Campaign Spending

Default Article
September 4, 2003   •  By IFS staff   •  , ,

Critics of American politics often say that spending on electoral campaigns harms our democracy and charge that the money goes for cynical, negative, and ...

This Is Reform? Predicting the Impact of the New Campaign Financing Regulations

November 20, 2002   •  By IFS staff   •  , ,

McCain-style campaign finance regulation is the new campaign reality. But what exactly will this reformist utopia look like? Assessing the “reformed” campaign of the future against the stated ...

Public Opinion and Campaign Finance: Reformers Versus Reality

October 1, 2002   •  By IFS staff   •  , ,

I n the 2000 race for the presidency, Arizona senator John McCain promoted campaign finance reform as a partial remedy for widespread citizen cynicism toward politics. On ...

Why is there So Little Money in U.S. Politics?

June 10, 2002   •  By IFS staff   •  ,

Thirty years ago, Gordon Tullock posed a provocative puzzle: considering the value of public policies at stake and the reputed in°uence of campaign contributions in ...

The Effect of War Chests on Challenger Entry in U.S. House Elections

October 1, 2001   •  By IFS staff   •  , ,

In this article, Jay Goodliffe challenges conventional wisdom on the effect of war chests in U.S. House elections. As many "reformers" suggest that war ...

It’s the Spending, Stupid: Understanding Campaign Finance in the Big-Government Era

July 1, 2001   •  By Matt Nese   •  ,

Proponents of new restrictions on campaign finance often argue that the United States spends too much money on campaigns and elections. That proposition is difficult to sustain ...

The Distribution of Campaign Spending Benefits across Groups

March 1, 2001   •  By IFS staff   •  , ,

Scholarly attention to congressional campaign spending has focused primarily on the benefits candidates receive from that spending, from challenger deterrence to election victory to ...

Who’s Buying Campaign Finance ‘Reform’?

January 1, 2001   •  By IFS staff   •  , ,

The campaign finance reform ‘campaign’ is controlled and financed by liberal Democrats: wealthy soft money donors to the Democratic party and candidates, liberal foundations and Democratic ...

Campaign Finance in U.S. House Primary and General Elections

January 1, 2001   •  By IFS staff   •  , ,

This chapter explores the relationship between U.S. House primary and general elections, focusing specifically on campaign finance. In the chapter, we assess how competitiveness in primaries ...

Why Do Political Action Committees Give Money to Candidates? Campaign Contributions, Policy Choices, and Election Outcomes

October 2, 2000   •  By IFS staff   •  ,

Rational political action committees (PACs) will give campaign contributions to candidates for two main reasons. Either the contributions are intended to influence the actions taken ...

Load more