Default Article

Tax-Financed Campaigns: A Speech-Chilling, Costly, and Failed Policy

January 1, 2018  •  By IFS Staff  •    •  

Tax-financed campaigns are government-operated programs that seek to replace or supplement private, voluntary campaign contributions with government grants of taxpayer dollars to candidates who meet certain requirements. These programs, often tagged with euphemistic names such as “democracy dollars” or “clean elections,” take many forms. Some provide tax dollars to candidates based on the donations they’ve received while other programs provide…

UPDATED: Clean Elections and Scandal: Case Studies from Maine, Arizona and New York City

August 14, 2013   •  By Joe Trotter   •  , ,

On June 27, 2011, The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett that a portion of Arizona’s tax-financed ...

UPDATED: Issue Analysis No. 3: Do Tax-Funded Campaigns Increase the Percentage of Women in State Legislatures?

August 14, 2013   •  By Alex Cordell   •  ,

Advocates of taxpayer-funded political campaigns, often called “clean elections” or “public financing” by their proponents, claim that these systems provide the ability for an increased number of diverse, non-traditional ...

UPDATED: Issue Analysis No. 2: Legislator Occupations – Change or Status Quo After Tax-Funded Campaigns

August 14, 2013   •  By Alex Cordell   •  ,

Proponents of taxpayer-financed political campaigns, often called “clean elections” by their supporters, assert that these programs will produce more diverse legislative bodies by allowing a greater number of ...

UPDATED: Issue Analysis No. 1: Do Taxpayer-Funded Campaigns Reduce Lobbyist and Special Interest Influence?

August 14, 2013   •  By Matt Nese   •  ,

Beginning with the 2000 election cycle, Arizona and Maine instituted taxpayer-funded political campaign programs for state legislative races. Sometimes called “clean elections” by their supporters, these programs seek to ...

Lots of Hope but Little Evidence at D.C. City Council Hearing

Default Article
July 15, 2013   •  By Luke Wachob   •  

On Thursday, July 11, the D.C. City Council Committee on Government Operations held a public roundtable on the feasibility of implementing taxpayer-funded campaigns for ...

CCP Testimony on “The Feasibility of Converting to a Public Financing Model for Elections in the District of Columbia”

July 11, 2013   •  By Matt Nese   •  ,

There are a number of issues highlighted in the statement: (I) recent corruption scandals in Washington D.C. would be unaffected by the existence of ...

Keating Testimony Video link

Default Article
May 8, 2013   •  By Sarah Lee   •  

CCP President David Keating testified yesterday before members of the New York State Senate on public financing of elections with a warning that emulating ...

CCP Comments before the New York State Senate Elections Committee

May 6, 2013   •  By Joe Trotter   •  , ,

While proponents of so-called “clean elections” proposals tout the programs as a panacea for eliminating corruption and “fixing government,” the experience of three states ...

Another Poor Idea for New York

Default Article
December 3, 2012   •  By Joe Trotter   •  

The Campaign Finance Institute has released a study on implementing taxpayer financed political welfare for politicians in the Empire State.  Claiming that this would cost ...

The Failure of “Citizen’s Elections”

Default Article
October 25, 2012   •  By Sarah Lee   •  

The New York Times has been in a dither lately over the efforts of Jonathan Soros (grandson of multi-billionaire George) to spend exorbitant amounts ...

Load more