If It’s Not Broken . . . or Is It?

January 1, 2000   •  By IFS staff   •  ,

This selection was excerpted from Inside Campaign Finance: Myths and Realities (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992). In this article, Frank J. Sorauf, a distinguished political ...

Buckley v. Valeo: A Landmark of Political Freedom

January 1, 1999   •  By IFS staff   •  ,

It is appropriate for an article about the Supreme Court's Buckley opinion to appear in a law review in the Buckeye State. In terms of ...

Do Campaign Donations Alter How a Politician Votes? Or, Do Donors Support Candidtes Who Value the Same Things that they Do?

October 1, 1997   •  By IFS staff   •  , , ,

Do special interest campaign contributions significantly alter how politicians vote on legislative issues? Can these political action committee (PAC) contributions ‘‘buy’’ votes within the Congress? Despite ...

Campaign Finance “Reform” Proposals: A First Amendment Analysis

September 4, 1997   •  By IFS staff   •  , ,

In the wake of recent reports of questionable campaign finance practices have come ever more draconian proposals to "reform" the campaign finance system. Those proposals ...

Why Congress Can’t Ban Soft Money

July 1, 1997   •  By IFS staff   •  , ,

Eliminating political party “soft money” and regulating similar spending by groups other than political parties are central features of many proposals that would reform campaign financing. ...

Political Money: The New Prohibition

January 1, 1997   •  By IFS staff   •  , ,

Our system of campaign financing fosters subterfuge and corruption, favors wealthy candidates over those not so blessed, puts candidates on a perpetual fund-raising treadmill, and is ...

Campaign Finance Regulation: Faulty Assumptions and Undemocratic Consequences

September 13, 1995   •  By Brad Smith   •  , ,

Efforts to limit political contributions and spending are extremely popular. Yet there is no serious evidence that campaign finance regulation has achieved or will achieve ...

Load more