Amicus Brief

This amicus brief, filed jointly with the Cato Institute, affirms the broad First Amendment rights of government employees when they speak on matters of ...

Austin has limited digitized billboards to only those that display “on-premises” messages, effectively prohibiting ideological or abstract messages. Austin raises various excuses to conceal ...

Most of the briefing in this case concerns a question the Court need not resolve: whether a pure censure resolution, imposed on a member ...

Florida’s law regulating social media platforms provides beneficial consumer protection measures that promote free expression and individual autonomy. But Florida’s law goes too far ...

The Cato Institute is challenging the constitutionality of the SEC’s Gag Regulation. Cato wants to write a book and host a public discussion with ...

The Institute for Free Speech urged two federal judges to put a stop to unethical legal gamesmanship by members of the Federal Election Commission. ...

Can a group be fined $18 million for not properly filing campaign finance reports? The Institute for Free Speech argues that such a massive ...

The line between religious and political coercion is illusory, but the line between teaching students about controversial subjects and “asking” them to demonstrate fealty ...

When citizens’ rights have been violated, they are entitled to their day in court. This basic tenet of the law is at issue in ...

The Supreme Court should grant review in this important case to protect petition rights and the speech of individuals from government actors filing frivolous ...