Daily Media Links 10/24: Money in Politics, Super PAC, party ad spending nearly on par, and more…

October 24, 2012   •  By Joe Trotter   •  
Default Article
In the News

Learn Liberty (IHS): Money in Politics 
Prof. Brad Smith argues that the real result of campaign finance regulation has been to turn elections into “a specialized game for an elite group of people who know the ropes and can manipulate them to their advantage.”
Watch…

Independent groups

Associated Press: Report: Super PAC, party ad spending nearly on par 
WASHINGTON — Outside groups have spent nearly the same as political parties in about two dozen competitive elections this year, a new report found.  
Read more…

WSJ: Will Bloomberg’s Super PAC Spend on Local Races? 
By Michael Howard Saul
Mayor Michael Bloomberg has already pledged to spend millions on political races around the country in the next two weeks, but he said he hasn’t decided whether to tap his personal fortune to help New York City candidates in next year’s municipal elections.  
Read more…

Disclosure


Baltimore Sun: Scare tactics from Question 6 opponents 
Editorial
Within hours of a news conference held by Angela McCaskill, who was suspended with pay from her job as head of diversity at Gallaudet University after the school learned that she had signed the petition to put Maryland’s marriage equality act on the ballot, she was featured in a new ad by the Maryland Marriage Alliance that claims Maryland’s Question 6 threatens the liberty and livelihood of anyone who objects to gay marriage.  

NY Times: Mauled by Ads, Incumbents Look to Declaw Outside Groups 
By JENNIFER STEINHAUER and JONATHAN WEISMAN
WASHINGTON — An expansive onslaught of negative political advertisements in Congressional races has left many incumbents, including some Republicans long opposed to restrictions on campaign spending, concluding that legislative measures may be in order to curtail the power of the outside groups behind most of the attacks. 

Campaign Finance


Huffington Post: Why Bother With Campaign Finance Reform?
By Steve Gillman
Apart from the many loopholes that will always exist for getting around campaign contribution limits, there is a more fundamental reason that we cannot stop big money from entering politics. It is the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. Unless we want to void that part of our political heritage and imprison people for speaking their minds or for putting their ideas on paper or in videos, politics will always be influenced by large quantities of money. There is no moral way to stop this.  
Read more…

Associated Press: WHY IT MATTERS: Campaign finance  
By JACK GILLUM 
This presidential election is on track to cost nearly $2 billion. It’s a staggering tab, and those who kick in big money to cover it stand to gain outsized influence over policy decisions by whoever wins. Your voice may not be heard as loudly as a result. 

Candidates and parties


National Journal: House Majority PAC Launches Seven New Ads 
By Scott Bland
House Majority PAC released seven new TV ads Tuesday, including five in new congressional districts as the House-focused Democratic super PAC expanded the scope of its advertising.  

Lobbying and ethics


NJ.com: Jack Abramoff: Congress members don’t know they’re being bribed 
By Louis Hochman
MORRIS TOWNSHIP — The problem, Jack Abramoff says, is that public officials don’t think they’re being bribed. 

Joe Trotter

Share via
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap